Counsel for Phil Ivey Files Hefty Appellate Brief in Battle Against Borgata

Legal counsel for Phil Ivey has filed a voluminous brief in the US Court of Appeals for the Third District in an attempt to move forward the appeal of Ivey and co-defendant Cheung Yin “Kelly” Sun of a $10.16 million judgment awarded to the Borgata in late 2016 in connection to Ivey’s and Sun’s complex “edge sorting” mini-baccarat scheme.

In this latest filing, submitted to the appellate court on a March 18 filing deadline, Ivey’s attorney Louis M. Barbone submitted a 39-page brief outlining statements of the general case and facts therein (as presented from Ivey’s defense viewpoint), along with a summary of arguments as to why Ivey and Sun should prevail on appeal.

The main brief is accompanied by an additional nine appendices totaling another 758 pages, making the total filing just under 800 pages in length. Though still being examined, the appendices in large part appear to be a reintroduction of evidence (mostly depositions and documentation) from the original New Jersey Circuit Court case.

Whether or not the appeal will be heard in the absence of the supercedeas (appellate) bond in the amount of the $10.16 million judgment being posted by Ivey and Sun remains unclear. However, Ivey’s counsel was granted leave early in February to file the official first brief in the appeal.

As is the point with any appeal, Ivey’s counsel will attempt here to re-argue the case. The primary brief offers four main arguments as to why the appellate court should find the December 2016 ruling favoring the Borgata to be in error. These four points include:

  1. “The District Court erred in failing to dismiss Plaintiff’s [Borgata’s] Complaint pursuant to the applicable Statute of Limitation” — In this argument, Barbone reiterates the claim that a sixth-month stature of limitations should have barred the Borgata from being allowed to argue its claims.
  2. “Plaintiff’s Complaint did in fact allege only a private cause of action for a violation under [New Jersey’s] Casino Control Act which should have been dismissed on Defendants’ Motion” — This is more of a technical legal argument offered by Barbone. According to this argument, all legal disagreements originated from New Jersey’s casino-based gambling are bound by the state’s CCA, and an investigation by New Jersey regulators did not assert that Ivey and Sun specifically violated any rules. Thus, according to Barbone, the case never should have been allowed to be adjudged as a common-law claim.
  3. “The Court’s marked cards finding was error, based upon both the undisputed facts and the essential elements of the marked card statute” — This point seeks to explore the finding of the lower court that Ivey and Sun “marked” the cards, despite never touching the cards themselves. There is little doubt that New Jersey’s CCA remains inadequate on the entire topic of edge sorting, and if this appeal indeed moves forward, this argument will again be a focus of subjective review.
  4. “[The applicable statute] in no way renders edge sorting illegal; unfair odds at the game of baccarat can only be accomplished by a violation of the rules and regulations designed to insure [sic] fair odds” — This argument asserts that though Ivey’s and Sun’s successful edge-sorting scheme significantly shifted the odds in Ivey’s favor, that was still not a violation of New Jersey’s gambling regulations. Since the entire point of the scheme was to ascertain the likely value (in approximate ranges) of the first card dealt in each hand, and thus change the generally known odds edges of the game, this last argument seems a stretch. (It’s also worth noting, as Barbone declares, that an expected “house edge” value is not a part of the state’s regulations regarding mini-baccarat). But, in layman’s terms, it’s about throwing more flotsam at the judicial wall to see what might stick.

There is far more of interest in this latest filing, though the sheer size of it demands a longer review. Meanwhile, the next step is expected to be the filing of a reply brief by the Borgata sometime in the next few weeks.

COMMENTS

Leave a Comment

*

LATEST NEWS

filter by

Dan Katz

23rd June 2019 // Gossip, Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Jeopardy! Destroyer James Holzhauer to Play in WSOP

The other poker players at the 2019 World Series of Poker had better hope that James Holzhauer has some catching up to...

Haley Hintze

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News, Op-ed

Hand Histories and the Data Portability Issue

With hand histories and HUDs (heads-up displays) being a hot news topic in recent weeks, it’s time to revisit the...

Haley Hintze

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

California Tribes Lose in House-Banked Card Games Legal Battle

A lawsuit brought by three prominent casino-operating California tribal nations targeting certain house-banked games...

Dan Katz

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Misc, News

Electronic Arts VP Says Loot Boxes Are “Quite Ethical,” Not Gambling

The tug-of-war between video game developers and governments over loot boxes continued this week when Kerry Hopkins,...

Haley Hintze

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

Germany’s Lower Saxony State Bans Unnamed International Online Payment Processor

As part of Germany’s ongoing efforts to block online-gambling operators licensed elsewhere in the European Union...

Dan Katz

22nd June 2019 // Legal News, News

U.S. Reps Introduce Appropriations Amendment to Defund Wire Act Enforcement

The United States Department of Justice recently pushed back its enforcement date for its new interpretation of the...