Peter King

Peter King’s New Federal Internet Gambling Bill a PPA-Coordinated Hail Mary?

“Doomed.”

That was Thursday’s word of the day, as typed by FlushDraw’s own David “F-Train” Behr, who’s currently on assignment in South America.  Behr’s single-word commentary came in FlushDraw’s secret private-chat backchannel, where the poker-news topics of the day are often discussed, and referred to yesterday’s news that US Representative Peter King (R-NY) had introduced his Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act of 2013, another belated attempt to force through some sort of United States federal-level internet gambling regulation.

peter-kingThe bill, constructed with the close assistance of the Poker Players Alliance, is a decent enough show pony, but doesn’t have the proverbial snowball’s chance in hell in a federal environment where the real short-term prospects for such action disintegrated with December’s collapse of Reid-Kyl negotiations.

Even as King dropped his measure (the text of which the PPA has published in its entirety), the American Gaming Association and the office of Senator Majority Leader engaged in another round of sniping over the Reid-Kyl bill’s demise, and that more accurately reflects the current state of US federal i-gambling legislation: That ball’s been tossed over to the states, where the real action on the topic is likely to occur for at least the next couple of years.

Still, the 134-page King bill contains all the trappings one might expect.  As of yesterday, it hadn’t yet been assigned a bill number, scheduled for committee hearings or even added to the official US Senate dockets, but the bill’s text is decent enough on first glance.  The PPA issued a press release congratulating King on submitting the bill, and quickly summarized the bill’s major points:

Among other things, the bill:

  • Requires states to be certified by the U.S. Department of Treasury to license potential operators. States may choose to participate in the national online gaming market without becoming a licensing agent, however;
  • Authorizes federal funding to address problem gambling addiction, similar to what is in place for all other types of addiction;
  • Gives states the freedom to opt-out of Internet gaming. Governors must notify the Department of Treasury that their state will opt-out within 120 days of passage of the bill, and opting out will NOT prohibit states from establishing their own intra-state online gaming regimes;
  • Ensures mandatory implementation of technologies to protect against underage gambling using the commercial and government databases used for online banking to verify age and identity;
  • Allows equal access to licenses for all providers, including Indian tribes and lotteries;
  • Preserves the traditional authority of regulators to determine the suitability of online operators when evaluating license applications; and
  • Contains high standards to thwart fraud, abuse and cheating to ensure fair games for customers.

FlushDraw plans a thorough reading of the bill, likely some time next week, to see if King’s measure contains any surprises.  The “equal access for all providers” provisions contained within represent, at last, an acquiescence to political reality, in that a bill such as this has a chance only if every possible pro-gambling faction in existence can be corralled into giving a bill like this its support.

The greater problem, however, is that it’s almost certainly too little, too late.  The structure of United States gambling laws dictates that these concerns are generally governed at the state level, not the federal one, with the US federal government moving in only when states don’t address certain situations, or when specific state statutes might be unconstitutional or otherwise impede upon existing federal laws.

Since several states have already moved forward with their own internet-gambling laws, that possible situation no longer exists: the legislative ship has sailed.

Still, it’s the old college try for the PPA, which remains a schizophrenic lobbying group, capable of solid work in gambling- and poker-related legal cases yet committed to spending its meager funds in quixotic and undermanned lobbying efforts at the federal level in Washington DC, where its lobbyists and offices are located.  That latter, ill-destined commitment represents more of the truth of the PPA as a revolving-door lobbying group than anything else.

In King’s bill, the PPA has also accessed one of its most available channels for introducing such legislation.  As several outlets reported yesterday, King’s son is a partner in the lobbying firm that PPA chairman and former NY GOP senator Alfonse D’Amato runs, meaning the apple didn’t fall too far from that particular tree.

Just don’t expect this one to even reach the floor of the House.  It’s “doomed” indeed.

COMMENTS

Leave a Comment

*

LATEST NEWS

filter by

Dan Katz

23rd June 2019 // Gossip, Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Jeopardy! Destroyer James Holzhauer to Play in WSOP

The other poker players at the 2019 World Series of Poker had better hope that James Holzhauer has some catching up to...

Haley Hintze

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News, Op-ed

Hand Histories and the Data Portability Issue

With hand histories and HUDs (heads-up displays) being a hot news topic in recent weeks, it’s time to revisit the...

Haley Hintze

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

California Tribes Lose in House-Banked Card Games Legal Battle

A lawsuit brought by three prominent casino-operating California tribal nations targeting certain house-banked games...

Dan Katz

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Misc, News

Electronic Arts VP Says Loot Boxes Are “Quite Ethical,” Not Gambling

The tug-of-war between video game developers and governments over loot boxes continued this week when Kerry Hopkins,...

Haley Hintze

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

Germany’s Lower Saxony State Bans Unnamed International Online Payment Processor

As part of Germany’s ongoing efforts to block online-gambling operators licensed elsewhere in the European Union...

Dan Katz

22nd June 2019 // Legal News, News

U.S. Reps Introduce Appropriations Amendment to Defund Wire Act Enforcement

The United States Department of Justice recently pushed back its enforcement date for its new interpretation of the...