Phil Ivey Loses British Supreme Court Appeal in Crockfords Edge-Sorting Case

American professional poker player and gambler Phil Ivey has lost his appeal before the British Supreme Court in his ongoing attempt to claim £7.7 million (about US $10.2 million) in disputed winnings from London’s Crockfords Club casino. The long-running case stemmed from Crockfords’ refusal to pay Ivey the £7.7 million in winnings after an extended gaming session in early 2012.

Wedenesday’s ruling by the British Supreme Court ends any chance that he will collect the £7.7 million he sought in the case. Crockfords refunded Ivey’s original wagering bankroll, while declining to pay out the now-adjudged illicit winnings.

Ivey later admitted to using an “edge sorting” gambit with playing partner “Kelly” Cheung Yin Sun at the Crockfords punto banco (mini baccarat) tables, thus triggering a British case over the legality of the edge-sorting scheme and Crockfords’ self-assumed right to withhold Ivey’s illicit winnings.

The case roughly parallels the ongoing US-based legal battle between Ivey (and Sun) and New Jersey’s Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa, in which the Borgata actually did allow Ivey to collect roughly $9.6 million in winnings using the same scheme, then successfully sued to recover the money. (That US case is destined for an appeal in the near future. The ploy by Ivey and Sun ended abruptly in October of 2012 when news of the Crockfords dispute became public, literally while Ivey and Sun were engaged in the same scheme at the Borg’s high-stakes mini-baccarat tables.

In releasing its ruling, the British Supreme Court declared that the scheme employed by Ivey and Sun was a violation of the integrity of the punto banco game being played.

Said Supreme Court Judge Anthony Hughes, “What Mr. Ivey did was to stage a carefully planned and executed sting.” Hughes also noted that Ivey undertook “positive steps to fix the deck” by deceiving the casino and its employees. Hughes declared that violating the premise of punto banco in such a way “is inevitably cheating.”

Added Lord Hughes, “If he had surreptitiously gained access to the shoe and re-arranged the cards physically himself, no one would begin to doubt that he was cheating. He accomplished exactly the same result through the unwitting but directed actions of the croupier, tricking her into thinking that what she did was irrelevant.”

Hughes continued by noting, “That, in a game which depends on random delivery of unknown cards, is inevitably cheating. That it was clever and skillful, and must have involved remarkably sharp eyes, cannot alter that truth.”

Ivey expressed his own definition of “integrity” in a statement following the ruling. “At the time I played at Crockfords, I believed that edge-sorting was a legitimate advantage-play technique and I believe that more passionately than ever today,” he said. “As a professional gambler, my integrity is everything to me.”

Crockfords also released a post-ruling statement. “We are delighted that the High Court, the Court of Appeal and now the Supreme Court have all found in Genting’s favor, confirming that we acted fairly and properly at all times and that Mr. Ivey’s conduct did indeed amount to cheating,” said Genting Casinos UK President Paul Willcock.

The decision in favor of Crockfords was reached unanimously by the five-member Supreme Court. The court noted that dishonesty was not necessarily a component of a cheating activity; Ivey had expressed repeatedly his belief that the edge-sorting activity was a legitimate advantage-play technique, despite an extended series of ruses and unusual requests that laid the groundwork for the scheme’s initial success.

The UK legal decision is non-binding on the similarly-themed US action involving Ivey and the Borgata, though legal elements of the case have been introduced in the Borgata case for informational purpose.

COMMENTS

Leave a Comment

*

LATEST NEWS

filter by

Dan Katz

18th February 2018 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

Bills to Regulate Video Game Loot Boxes Introduced in Hawaii

A pair of bills have been introduced in the Hawaii House of Representatives (with twin bills in the Senate) that aim to...

Dan Katz

16th February 2018 // Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Mike Leah Answers Critics About WPT Fallsview Ending

If you are on this website, you have probably heard by now of the controversy surrounding the end of the WPT Fallsview...

Haley Hintze

15th February 2018 // Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

ESPN to Broadcast 2018 WSOP Main Event, One Drop

The World Series of Poker has released its live schedule of televised events for this summer’s WSOP in Las Vegas....

Haley Hintze

15th February 2018 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

California Online Poker Legislation Likely Shelved for 2018

The chance that 2018 will be the year that regulated online poker is approved in California appears to be nonexistent...

Haley Hintze

14th February 2018 // Legal News, Misc, News

Most Prize Payments Affirmed in Nevada Bad Beat Jackpot Dispute

Score one for the poker players, after Nevada’s Gaming Control Board has reaffirmed an earlier decision that...

Haley Hintze

14th February 2018 // Misc, News, Op-ed, Poker Tournaments

Chop, Chip Dump Stir Controversy at WPT Fallsview

Tongues are wagging over what should be adhered to regarding tournament poker’s protocols in the wake of a...