Rush Street Interactive Fine for Underage Gambling Headlines New Jersey DGE January Director’s Actions

The first known case of underage gamblers being able to successfully place bets on a regulated US-based site is the most significant incident to be dealt with in the latest series of director’s enforcement actions announced by the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE). This latest update offered the resolution of a variety of gambling violations, and the distinctiveness of the $30,000 fine assessed against Rush Street Interactive NJ, LLC, the entity behind the site operated in New Jersey through a licensing agreement with Golden Nugget Atlantic City.

Not all the details have been made public. Rush Street Interactive issued a brief statement several days back offering some insight, beginning with the fact that the episode was discovered internally and covered roughly 14 months, from November of 2016 through January 2018. According to several reports, including this one from AP gambling-beat writer Wayne Parry, 13 different underage gamblers — all of roughly college age (meaning 18, 19 or 20), were able to sign up on the PlaySugarHouse site and collectively wager almost $5,000.

According to the reports, a software error was responsible for the hole in security. The quizzical part of the story comes from the last paragraph of Parry’s brief piece, which reads: “The [DGE] said a defect in Rush Street Interactive’s code was discovered in January 2018. Instead of precisely recording a patron’s date of birth, it allowed a three-year variation in that date, letting underage patrons create and use internet gambling accounts.”

Really? That seems odd, that any software would allow a three-year variation in the year of birth during the sign-up process, year of birth tending to be a single-answer type of thing. Also not disclosed is whether the faulty age-verification code came from Rush Street Interactive itself or a specialized, third-party age-verification vendor, even though Rush Street is taking the hit. The November 2017 start date for the activity is only two months later than PlaySugarHouse’s September 2016 launch, suggesting that this was indeed a growing series of college-age gamblers discovering the hole, either as single gamblers or in small groups.

There was also a stretch of more than five months from when RSI discovered the software flaw and when the DGE filed its formal complaint, late last June, though it’s likely the two entities conducted a joint investigation once the problem emerged. Much of the difference between the $5,000 wagered and the $30,000 fine assessed may be an allocation toward the DGE’s investigative expenses.

“We take this matter very seriously,” Rush Street Interactive said in a statement issued to select outlets. “As soon as our team discovered the misconfiguration, we self-reported it to the gaming commission and took immediate action to correct and prevent recurrence. Responsible gaming is a top priority for us.” RSI has not published a matching statement on its corporate site, and as a privately-held entity, is not forced to do so as a matter of investor disclosure.

The latest batch of director’s actions also includes another matter involving Golden Nugget AC. Last month, both Harrah’s AC and Golden Nugget AC were fined by the DGE for accepting wagers on college teams based in New Jersey, in violation of the state’s new sports-betting codes. In both instances, which involved multiple patrons and occurred in September, it appears the casinos likely just reposted the block of lines established by their sister casinos in Las Vegas, without bothering to strip out the New Jersey collegiate games.

The odd thing, though, was that Harrah’s AC was fined $2,000, while Golden Nugget was assessed only $390. This latest batch of actions includes a new $2,000 fine against the Nugget, meaning the DGE”s actions amounted to a two-parter for some undisclosed, technical reason. The fines against both Harrah’s AC and Golden Nugget AC served notice to all of New Jersey’s casinos to pay closer notice to any and all differences between the established sports books in Nevada and the new offerings in New Jersey, even if they are sharing oddsmaking information.


Leave a Comment



filter by

Haley Hintze

16th June 2019 // Industry, Misc, News, Online Poker Action

PartyPoker Announces More Bot Seizures in May

Partypoker has announced the latest results in its continuing effort to combat poker bots, the computerized software...

Haley Hintze

15th June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

UKGC Hits Platinum Gaming and Gamesys With Hefty Social-Responsibility Failure Fines

The United Kingdom Gambling Commission (UKGC) is back in the news this week with the latest in a long-running series of...

Dan Katz

14th June 2019 // Gossip, News, Poker Tournaments

Maria Ho Involved in Minor Hand Controversy at WSOP After Misunderstanding

Last week, we discussed a controversial hand at the end of a World Series of Poker final table that had poker pros and...

Dan Katz

14th June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, News

DoJ Extends Wire Act Compliance Deadline Through End of Year

It seems that interstate online poker in the United States is safe for at least the rest of the year, as a new memo...

Haley Hintze

13th June 2019 // Industry, Misc, News

Boyaa Poker Tour Resurfaces, Moves Live Events Outside Chinese Jurisdiction

Here’s an interesting little tale from China, where poker remains not exactly The Next Big Thing™. Hong...

Haley Hintze

11th June 2019 // Industry, Misc, News, Online Poker Action

Publisher of Hold’em Manager HUD Bashes partypoker Over Upcoming Software Changes

The parent company of Hold’em Manager and several other third-party software programs, Max Value Software LLC...