Colombia Online Gambling Blacklist

South America Update: Colombia to Implement Online Gambling Blacklist

Add Colombia to the list of countries seeking ways to curtail the offering of online gambling services to its citizens by international gambling operators.  Coljuegos, the country’s official gambling regulatory agency, has asked another of Colombia’s government agencies, Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (Ministry of Information and Communications Technology, or ICT, in English) to block 325 online gambling-relate domains.

The ICT has also published the list of the 325 domains it hopes that Colombia ISPs will be forced to block.  The list includes most, if not all, of the world’s largest and most notable gambling firms, and it also includes all major forms of online gambling; the to-be-blocked domains run the gamut from online poker and casino games to sports betting, bingo and even backgammon.

Among the listed domains on Colombia’s proposed blacklist, which generally focuses on Spanish-language offerings from major international sites:

  • www.unibet.com
  • www.pokerstars.com/espanol/
  • poker.betfair.com/es/
  • bingo.paddypower.com
  • bingo.betsson.com/es/
  • www.caesarsbingo.com
  • www.betfred.com
  • casino.bovada.lv
  • www.bodog.eu
  • es.royalvegascasino.com
  • www.titanpoker.com/es/
  • www.888casino.es
  • www.williamhill.es
  • es.partycasino.com
  • www.mansioncasino.com/es/
  • casino.ladbrokes.com/es
  • es.partypoker.com
  • www.foxybingo.com
  • www.bet365.com

Many more companies of note are included, even if the list as published looks like a first draft, including duplicated domain entries and even an e-mail address or two.  It’s also clear that there are dozens, if not hundreds, of gambling domins that could also have been included.

The entries of the Bodog and Bovada domains certainly aren’t unexpected, but offer an extra taste of curiosity.  Less than six weeks ago, Bodog announced its plans to expand over time into 14 new Central American and South American markets.  Among those was “Columbia”, (which one can safely assume was supposed to Colombia, but that particular market expansion might be undergoing a bit of a rethink.

Then again, announcing a blacklist is one thing; continuously updating and implementing such a blacklist is a far greater challenge.  It’s not hard at all for online sites to reconfigure domain addresses, at will and virtually at a moment’s notice, meaning that it all turns into an international game of online whack-a-mole.

In this case, the grey-market providers will likely be better off than those in large, well-regulated countries, such as the major European firms.  Those Euro giants don’t have a lot to fear from Colombian regulators, but serving Colombia would likely put them afoul of their own host-region regulations, which often declare it a violation to willfully supply services to a “banned” jurisdiction.

In Colombia’s specific case, said banning and blacklisting appears to be as much of a squeeze play for hefty licensing fees as it is about any sort of consumer protection.  Colombia announced its new online-gambling regulatory regime late last year, but with a prohibitive 19% value-added tax (VAT) on player deposits.  The proposed VAT tax has since been dumped and replaced with a more direct licensing arrangement, but most international operators appear to view the Colombian licensing proposal as too pricey to be worth the bother.

There’s a secondary ripple effect that might play out should Colombia’s proposed blacklist become reality.  The country’s resonable proximity to the United States has made it one of the more popular destinations for American online poker players seeking to play online amid the US’s own large-scale blockade against the activity.  Colombia’s far from the top such destination, but its low cost of living, short travel distance, good party scene, and other factors have drawn anywhere between dozens and hundreds of poker-playing émigrés from the States.  Those players could be forcd to relocate again.

Or, perhaps, the blacklist proposal will fall apart.  It doesn’t appear as if Coljuegos really wants to implement the blacklist, if it can find a way to force international online operators to cough up what the country believes is a reasonable license fee.

COMMENTS

Leave a Comment

*

LATEST NEWS

filter by

Dan Katz

23rd June 2019 // Gossip, Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Jeopardy! Destroyer James Holzhauer to Play in WSOP

The other poker players at the 2019 World Series of Poker had better hope that James Holzhauer has some catching up to...

Haley Hintze

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News, Op-ed

Hand Histories and the Data Portability Issue

With hand histories and HUDs (heads-up displays) being a hot news topic in recent weeks, it’s time to revisit the...

Haley Hintze

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

California Tribes Lose in House-Banked Card Games Legal Battle

A lawsuit brought by three prominent casino-operating California tribal nations targeting certain house-banked games...

Dan Katz

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Misc, News

Electronic Arts VP Says Loot Boxes Are “Quite Ethical,” Not Gambling

The tug-of-war between video game developers and governments over loot boxes continued this week when Kerry Hopkins,...

Haley Hintze

22nd June 2019 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

Germany’s Lower Saxony State Bans Unnamed International Online Payment Processor

As part of Germany’s ongoing efforts to block online-gambling operators licensed elsewhere in the European Union...

Dan Katz

22nd June 2019 // Legal News, News

U.S. Reps Introduce Appropriations Amendment to Defund Wire Act Enforcement

The United States Department of Justice recently pushed back its enforcement date for its new interpretation of the...