Colombia Online Gambling Blacklist

South America Update: Colombia to Implement Online Gambling Blacklist

Add Colombia to the list of countries seeking ways to curtail the offering of online gambling services to its citizens by international gambling operators.  Coljuegos, the country’s official gambling regulatory agency, has asked another of Colombia’s government agencies, Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (Ministry of Information and Communications Technology, or ICT, in English) to block 325 online gambling-relate domains.

The ICT has also published the list of the 325 domains it hopes that Colombia ISPs will be forced to block.  The list includes most, if not all, of the world’s largest and most notable gambling firms, and it also includes all major forms of online gambling; the to-be-blocked domains run the gamut from online poker and casino games to sports betting, bingo and even backgammon.

Among the listed domains on Colombia’s proposed blacklist, which generally focuses on Spanish-language offerings from major international sites:

  • www.unibet.com
  • www.pokerstars.com/espanol/
  • poker.betfair.com/es/
  • bingo.paddypower.com
  • bingo.betsson.com/es/
  • www.caesarsbingo.com
  • www.betfred.com
  • casino.bovada.lv
  • www.bodog.eu
  • es.royalvegascasino.com
  • www.titanpoker.com/es/
  • www.888casino.es
  • www.williamhill.es
  • es.partycasino.com
  • www.mansioncasino.com/es/
  • casino.ladbrokes.com/es
  • es.partypoker.com
  • www.foxybingo.com
  • www.bet365.com

Many more companies of note are included, even if the list as published looks like a first draft, including duplicated domain entries and even an e-mail address or two.  It’s also clear that there are dozens, if not hundreds, of gambling domins that could also have been included.

The entries of the Bodog and Bovada domains certainly aren’t unexpected, but offer an extra taste of curiosity.  Less than six weeks ago, Bodog announced its plans to expand over time into 14 new Central American and South American markets.  Among those was “Columbia”, (which one can safely assume was supposed to Colombia, but that particular market expansion might be undergoing a bit of a rethink.

Then again, announcing a blacklist is one thing; continuously updating and implementing such a blacklist is a far greater challenge.  It’s not hard at all for online sites to reconfigure domain addresses, at will and virtually at a moment’s notice, meaning that it all turns into an international game of online whack-a-mole.

In this case, the grey-market providers will likely be better off than those in large, well-regulated countries, such as the major European firms.  Those Euro giants don’t have a lot to fear from Colombian regulators, but serving Colombia would likely put them afoul of their own host-region regulations, which often declare it a violation to willfully supply services to a “banned” jurisdiction.

In Colombia’s specific case, said banning and blacklisting appears to be as much of a squeeze play for hefty licensing fees as it is about any sort of consumer protection.  Colombia announced its new online-gambling regulatory regime late last year, but with a prohibitive 19% value-added tax (VAT) on player deposits.  The proposed VAT tax has since been dumped and replaced with a more direct licensing arrangement, but most international operators appear to view the Colombian licensing proposal as too pricey to be worth the bother.

There’s a secondary ripple effect that might play out should Colombia’s proposed blacklist become reality.  The country’s resonable proximity to the United States has made it one of the more popular destinations for American online poker players seeking to play online amid the US’s own large-scale blockade against the activity.  Colombia’s far from the top such destination, but its low cost of living, short travel distance, good party scene, and other factors have drawn anywhere between dozens and hundreds of poker-playing émigrés from the States.  Those players could be forcd to relocate again.

Or, perhaps, the blacklist proposal will fall apart.  It doesn’t appear as if Coljuegos really wants to implement the blacklist, if it can find a way to force international online operators to cough up what the country believes is a reasonable license fee.

COMMENTS

Leave a Comment

*

LATEST NEWS

filter by

Haley Hintze

17th January 2020 // Legal News, Misc, News

Pennsylvania’s Penn National Fined for Poker Tourney Regulatory Misstep

Pennsylvania casino entity Mountainview Thoroughbred Racing Association, LLC, the parent company of the Hollywood...

Haley Hintze

16th January 2020 // Legal News, Misc, News

Failed Australian Poker Backing Deal Results in Lawsuit Against James Hopkins

Another poker story emanating from Australia in recent days is a failed backing deal in which a related team of backers...

Haley Hintze

15th January 2020 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

Australian Regulator Orders Blocking of Ignition Casino, Eight Other Sites

Australia’s online poker players have seemingly lost another outlet for playing their game with the news that...

Haley Hintze

14th January 2020 // Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

World Series of Poker Announces 2020 ‘Championship’ Event Slate

The World Series of Poker (WSOP) has continued fleshing out the 2020 WSOP schedule of events. In recent days, after two...

Haley Hintze

11th January 2020 // Industry, Misc, News

Global Poker Awards Announces 2020 Voting Process, Expands Categories

The poker world’s largest celebration of its own, the Global Poker Awards, has announced more details for its...

Dan Katz

11th January 2020 // News, Online Poker Action

It Could Maybe Happen: 25-Cent Pokerstars Spin & Go’s Have a $1 Million Jackpot Chance This Weekend

The great advantage to being a micro- to low-stakes online poker player, as I was when I was able to regularly play...