Golden Nugget Atlantic City

Golden Nugget Atlantic City Wins $1.5 Million Baccarat Case

Golden Nugget Atlantic CityThe Golden Nugget in Atlantic City, New Jersey has won a favorable ruling in a $1.5 million baccarat scandal some two years after the case was first heard.

On April 30, 2012, a group of 14 gamblers were playing mini-baccarat at the Golden Nugget in Atlantic City when they realized something was not quite right with the deck of cards being used for the popular game. The gamblers noticed a specific pattern in the cards being dealt, promptly attempted to take advantage of the situation and increased their bets from $10 per hand up to $5,000 per hand at one stage.

By the time their gambling spree ended, the 14 gamblers had taken the house for $1,536,700 (over 41 consecutive hands). When the players began winning and winning heavily the Golden Nugget’s surveillance supervisors stepped in to see if they could discover any cheating occurring.

The casino stated during the case that: “From the beginning to the end of play, however, the plaintiff could not identify any particular act of those players that actually constituted swindling and cheating.”

Nine of the group managed to cash out a combined $558,900 because the casino, at the time, did not realize what had actually happened until an in-depth investigation took place. The casino refused to redeem an additional $977,800 in chips, however.

Upon completion of the internal investigation, the Golden Nugget discovered that the playing cards supplied by Kansas City playing card manufacturer Gemaco had been supplied unshuffled despite a guarantee from Gemaco that the deck would be completely random when first opened. The players then took advantage of being able to accurately narrow down the next cards, much like when a card counter plays blackjack.

Although the Golden Nugget claimed the game was illegal because the cards were not pre-shuffled, a preliminary court hearing in August 2012 went in favour of the gamblers and the casino was ordered to pay the remainder of the outstanding winnings. The casino’s owner, Tilman Fertitta, offered to settle the outstanding amount as long as the gamblers dropped their other claims against the casino, which included racial discrimination, illegal detention and racketeering. The gamblers refused the offer as they wanted to seek damages and costs in addition to their winnings.

On Friday 13 June, 2014, Judge James Isman ruled the game in question was in fact illegal under state casino rules due to the unshuffled cards. As a result, the casino was instructed not to settle the outstanding $977,800 and to recover the $558,900 that it had originally paid out on the night of the incident.

A spokesperson for the Golden Nugget said in a statement: “We were 100 per cent vindicated by Judge Isman’s ruling. Remarkably, and despite this generous proposal, the gamblers and their lawyers steadfastly refused, and selfishly wanted more damages than just the gambling winnings. Instead of walking away with over a $1.5m win, the gamblers must now return all of their gambling chips to the Golden Nugget. There are obvious lessons to be learned by all sides as a result of this incident. Unfortunately for the gamblers, it cost them over $1.5m.”

Phil IveyIt will be interesting to see how the ruling in the Golden Nugget case affects the ongoing saga surrounding Phil Ivey and Borgata. You may recall that New Jersey’s Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa filed a suit against Ivey and his female companion after Ivey won $9.626 million playing high-stakes baccarat during four separate visits to the Borgata in 2012.

Ivey is believed to have used “edge sorting” to stack the odds in his favour, the same method that he admitted to using when in the lavish London casino Crockfords. Ivey is currently suing Crockfords casino for $12.1 million after it withheld that sum from Ivey in August 2013.


Leave a Comment



filter by

Haley Hintze

17th January 2020 // Legal News, Misc, News

Pennsylvania’s Penn National Fined for Poker Tourney Regulatory Misstep

Pennsylvania casino entity Mountainview Thoroughbred Racing Association, LLC, the parent company of the Hollywood...

Haley Hintze

16th January 2020 // Legal News, Misc, News

Failed Australian Poker Backing Deal Results in Lawsuit Against James Hopkins

Another poker story emanating from Australia in recent days is a failed backing deal in which a related team of backers...

Haley Hintze

15th January 2020 // Industry, Legal News, Misc, News

Australian Regulator Orders Blocking of Ignition Casino, Eight Other Sites

Australia’s online poker players have seemingly lost another outlet for playing their game with the news that...

Haley Hintze

14th January 2020 // Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

World Series of Poker Announces 2020 ‘Championship’ Event Slate

The World Series of Poker (WSOP) has continued fleshing out the 2020 WSOP schedule of events. In recent days, after two...

Haley Hintze

11th January 2020 // Industry, Misc, News

Global Poker Awards Announces 2020 Voting Process, Expands Categories

The poker world’s largest celebration of its own, the Global Poker Awards, has announced more details for its...

Dan Katz

11th January 2020 // News, Online Poker Action

It Could Maybe Happen: 25-Cent Pokerstars Spin & Go’s Have a $1 Million Jackpot Chance This Weekend

The great advantage to being a micro- to low-stakes online poker player, as I was when I was able to regularly play...