Bovada Poker Icon

Bovada Stops New Player Signups from Nevada, Delaware

Bovada’s decision in recent days to stop signing up new players from the US states of Nevada and Delaware continues a trend by the largest remaining “offshore” online-poker sites still serving Americans to withdraw from states where the game is formally and authorized and regulated.

Bovada, which operates as a skin on the Bodog network and is a separate brand name devoted exclusively to the United States market, has already taken a similar stance in New Jersey the third (of 50) US states where the playing of online poker is available through state-authorized sites.

In terms of international sites that serve American players, the Bodog-Bovada network is easily the largest remaining in the post-Black Friday era.  Traffic-tracking site PokerScout estimates Bodog as the seventh-largest online network (Bodog doesn’t allow third-party sites to directly monitor its traffic), while the next largest, with perhaps only a third of Bodog-Bovada’s traffic.

As of mid-June, Merge checks in at 16th on PokerScout’s list, based on cash-game players, and after that the dropoff continues: The Chico Network ranks 26th, the Winning Poker Network is down a bit more at 29th, the Equity Poker Network is currently ranked 36th, the Lock-less Revolution Network has dropped to 40th, and the Bitcoin-only site SealsWithClubs is listed at 44th.  Beyond that there are a few startups and tiny operations, none of which offers significant player traffic.

It’s a meager collection, a sure sign that American online-poker traffic remains splintered, caught in a “wait and see” mode.  But what is interesting is that the largest of these remaining offshore sites are fairly uniform in not serving US states where state-regulated alternatives exist.

Let’s run down the list of the top six networks, not counting SWC.  Since SWC is a Bitcoin-based site, players are able to log on and play anonymously.  As such, SWC doesn’t block players from any jurisdiction.  The Chico Network (once known as the Action Poker Network) is also something of an aberration, since only some of its sites accept US players, and the network itself is attempting to rebuild its reputation after changing ownership; the network nearly failed in 2012, leaving players’ funds endangered, but has reorganized itself and struggled on.

Here’s the list of states blocked by each of the networks.

Bovada (Bodog): Delaware, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, New York.

Merge Network (Carbon Poker and others): Delaware, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Utah, Washington State, District of Columbia.

Chico Network: (unstated at present time)

Winning Poker Network: Delaware, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, Washington, District of Columbia

Equity Poker Network: Hawaii, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, New York, Utah, Virginia, Washington State, District of Columbia.

Revolution Poker Network: indeterminate, but not known to be accepting players from Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri, New Jersey or Nevada at last report.  Following the departure of the sinking Lock Poker, the remainder of the Revolution Network appears to be operated by owners connected with Intertops, the oldest and most reputable of the other Revolution sites.  The Intertops-connected ownership group appears to be operating the network on an invitation-only basis, regarding new US players.

bovada-poker-iconAnd that’s the list.  It means that, with the possible exception of the Chico Network, it’s a clean sweep in these remaining networks in avoiding US states that have formally set up their own online-poker jurisdictions.

The exodus of these networks from the Nevada-New Jersey-Delaware troika was catalyzed by the cease-and-desist notice sent by New Jersey authorities to a half dozen US-based online affiliates in late March.  All that really did, however, was speed up the process.

One can look at the list of other states listed blocked by some of the states and see the same pattern.  Washington State, New York, Kentucky, Maryland… these have been other “trouble” states for offshore poker sites, either involved in cash or domain seizures or in passing of laws banning the game for its residents.

When the NV/NJ/DE threesome passed its laws regulating online poker, they also implemented severe penalties for unlicensed operators.  Given the ability of other states and federal authorities to conduct these “long arm” seizures, it made leaving these troublesome states a rather easy choice for the networks to make.

COMMENTS

Leave a Comment

*

LATEST NEWS

filter by

Dan Katz

8th February 2020 // Gossip, News, Online Poker Action

Phil Galfond Down €750,000 to VeniVidi1993 in Galfond Challenge

Look, I don’t typically make a habit of feeling bad when people of means lose money, but oh man, I am starting to get...

Dan Katz

2nd February 2020 // News, Online Poker Action

PokerStars, partypoker Launching Dueling Bounty Tourney Series on Super Bowl Sunday

The year 2020 is already one-twelfth gone. It seems like just yesterday that Larry David was arguing that it was too...

Haley Hintze

31st January 2020 // Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Coronavirus Outbreak Forces Postponement of Triton Jeju Series

The Triton Super High Roller Series scheduled for mid-Februry in Jeju, South Korea has become the first poker event...

Dan Katz

31st January 2020 // News, Poker Tournaments

High Roller Series Schedule Released for 2020 WSOP

The Super Bowl (oh wait, I don’t want to get sued… the “BIG GAME”) is this weekend, but once the offseason...

Haley Hintze

31st January 2020 // Industry, Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Still a Waiting Game for Michigan Online Poker

Would-be Michigan online poker players are dealing with mixed emotions in the wake of news that fully legalized and...

Dan Katz

26th January 2020 // Industry, Misc, News, Op-ed

PokerStars Founder Isai Scheinberg Finally Surrenders to U.S. Authorities

Couldn’t avoid the inevitable If there was an online poker Mount Rushmore, Isai Scheinberg’s face would almost...