Pennsylvania Online Gambling Bill Clears Two Senate Committee Votes

Pennsylvania House Members Reintroduce Online Poker Legislation

Online poker and other forms of Internet-based gambling are back on the legislative slate in Pennsylvania, again making the state the foremost battleground in the ongoing search for the fourth US state to officially legalize and regulate the online game.  The latest bill, House Bill 392 (HB 392), is sponsored by PA State Rep. George Dunbar and co-sponsored by State Rep. Rosita Youngblood.

pennsylvania-stamp-2Both Dunbar and Youngblood have supported pro-online gaming measures in previous years, and their effort to put forth the bill was announced in a House memorandum last week.  According to that statement from Dunbar and Youngblood, the bill seeks to renew the “bipartisan effort” from 2016 that ultimately fell short of its mark, when elements of this bill and a somewhat similar PA Senate version championed by Sen. John Payne fell short of passage.

“Ultimately,” wrote Dunbar and Youngblood, “this bipartisan legislation failed to reach the Governor for his signature, and we will be re-introducing legislation similar to what the House passed in October of 2016 (HB 1887).”

The two state senators also issued a summary of HB 392’s key points:

  • Fix the local share assessment issue by requiring all casinos, except Category 3 casinos, to pay a $10 million fee to host municipalities;
  • Regulate and tax iGaming;
  • Impose consumer protections on and tax online fantasy sports operators;
  • Allow gaming tablets in international airports;
  • Remove the Category 3 casino amenity requirement;
  • Streamline non-gaming vendor registration requirements;
  • Permit gaming manufactures to utilize private laboratories to test gaming devices;
  • Authorize the PGCB to create new regulations to allow for new types of slot machines;
  • Increase license, permit and registration renewal periods;
  • Allow multi-state linkage of slot machines to increase jackpots; and,
  • Require uniform advertisement of the problem gaming assistance number.

The local share assessment issue remains an ever-present thorn in the side of Pennsylvania’s state-level politicians.  Previously, the state’s casinos had been required to pay that $10 million fee, until a state court ruled the form of the mandate to be unconstitutional.  To date, Pennsylvania has not found a replacement legislative remedy that would likely survive a similar curt challenge, even though most of the state’s casinos are voluntarily paying the assessment, which redistributes some of the casinos’ income elsewhere across the state.

The state also remains somewhat desperate to plug a gaping hole in its annual budget which was already supposed to have been filled with tax revenue generated from just this — state-licensed online gaming.  Since Pennsylvania is required by law to operate under a balanced budget, the unexpected budget hole left by last year’s failures looms large, and serves as an impetus for Pennsylvania to get something done this time around.

Dunbar’s and Youngblood’s HB 392 does not include one of the competing approaches championed by another portion of the state’s gambling interests.  That faction, which hoped to see video slots legalized in the state’s bars, doesn’t get much out of SB 392.  Whether that leads to another round of internal battling among the state’s pro-gambling forces — as happened last year — remains to be seen.

At least two Senate bills on the same topic are expected to be introduced in the near future.  Last month, both Sen. Kim Ward (R-Hempfield) and Sen. Jay Costa (D-Forest Hills) announced pending bills.  Costa also issued a Senate memorandum about the contents of his yet-to-be-dropped bill, which shows it to be largely similar — and possible this session’s companion measure — to Dunbar’s and Youngblood’s HB 392.

Costa’s as-yet-unsubmitted bill will also seek to reenact the $10 million tax levied against the state’s largest casinos, and like HB 392, will allow for slot-style, interactive gambling at the state’s two largest airports, in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.  However, like HB 392, the bill does not cater to the Commonwealth’s bar and tavern interests, who are also looking for a slice of the pie should Pennsylvania forge ahead with the gambling expansion.

Dunbar’s and Youngblood’s HB 392 measure was assigned to PA’s House Gaming Oversight Committee earlier today.  It’s the first committee stop for the first of several bills in what may be the pivotal year for Pennsylvania’s online gambling hopes.


Leave a Comment



filter by

Dan Katz

29th February 2020 // Uncategorised

Is the Coronavirus a Threat to the 2020 WSOP?

This has been one hell of a week. The coronavirus (COVID-19) is picking up steam globally. World financial markets have...

Dan Katz

26th February 2020 // Uncategorised

Side Bets Available at PokerStars Poker Tables

Poker is gambling. We like to say that it is a game of skill – and it is – but it is also gambling. And that’s...

Dan Katz

17th February 2020 // News, Online Poker Action, Poker Tournaments

World Series of Poker Expands Online Bracelet Schedule to 14 Events

On Thursday, the World Series of Poker released the schedule for this summer’s online bracelet events, to be hosted...

Dan Katz

8th February 2020 // Gossip, News, Online Poker Action

Phil Galfond Down €750,000 to VeniVidi1993 in Galfond Challenge

Look, I don’t typically make a habit of feeling bad when people of means lose money, but oh man, I am starting to get...

Dan Katz

2nd February 2020 // News, Online Poker Action

PokerStars, partypoker Launching Dueling Bounty Tourney Series on Super Bowl Sunday

The year 2020 is already one-twelfth gone. It seems like just yesterday that Larry David was arguing that it was too...

Haley Hintze

31st January 2020 // Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Coronavirus Outbreak Forces Postponement of Triton Jeju Series

The Triton Super High Roller Series scheduled for mid-Februry in Jeju, South Korea has become the first poker event...