Suggested Possible Pechanga-PokerStars Coalition Building in California: “Completely False”

A weekend feature at Online Poker Report suggested that California’s Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians led the way at last week’s NIGA convention in San Diego in promoting an inclusive compromise to end legislative battles over competing California online poker bills may, instead, be an overly optimistic example of political spin.

CaliforniaThe years-long battle over legalizing intrastate online poker in California has seen the process stymied by the hardline demands of a narrowing coalition of tribal nations demanding exclusivity in providing online poker to Californians, blocking alleged “bad actor” service providers such as the formerly US-facing PokerStars or California’s prominent pari-mutuel industry, which is also demanding seats at the virtual table.

FlushDraw spoke on Monday with a source with knowledge of what transpired at the NIGA (National Indian Gaming Association) meeting last Tuesday, who insisted on anonymity as a condition of providing insight.  The source derided the OPR update as being “all spin,” and framed the statements being made as an example of “Pechanga trying to control the narrative” surrounding the iPoker legislative debate.

The Pechanga tribal nation and its chairman, Mark Macarro, have increasingly come under attack in several media outlets (including here at FlushDraw) questioning the tribe’s sincerity in its attempts to move California online-poker legislation forward.  Given that the narrowing-but-powerful, Pechanga-led coalition continues to insist on barriers to market entry that virtual guarantee the failure of the bills it favors, the possibility of such legislation being a years-long blocking tactic continues to grow.

Last week’s NIGA convention in San Diego saw the tribal leaders of nine powerful Cali tribes again discussing the issue, including several of the seven tribes recently signing a pair of hardline letters to state legislators again demanding both the exclusion of the state’s pari-mutuel outlets and of the Amaya-owned PokerStars, which has already entered into preliminary service agreements with other California tribes and cardrooms.

At last Tuesday’s meeting, which was called by the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation’s new chairman Cody Martinez, talk indeed returned to building coalitions.  The recent Online Poker Report feature, by Dave Palermo, suggested that Pechanga chairman Macarro led a push for an all-inclusive proposal dropping opposition to PokerStars on alleged “bad actor” or “tainted asset” grounds, even though PokerStars is no longer owned by the Isai Scheinberg family, having been sold to Canada’s Amaya Gaming last year.

Instead, as reported at OPR, the Pechanga-led group now thinks that bills can be pushed forward by perhaps dropping opposition to Stars, but continuing to oppose the state’s pari-mutuel industry.  “If all the tribes got together with PokerStars … I’d like to see any legislator try to get in front of that train,” an unidentified source told OPR.

The tradeoff, of course, is that the other tribes, including several powerful nations who already have or who might consider partnering with PokerStars and Amaya to use its software, would have to support a Pechanga-backed bill such as Rep. Mike Gatto’s AB 9, currently under consideration.

Such a tribes-only consensus also defies other political realities in California, including a vow by Governor Jerry Brown that a Cali online-poker bill that excludes the state’s pari-mutuel outlets is a “non-starter.”  The chance that Gatto’s bill could achieve two-thirds majority votes in both state houses while overcoming a threatened veto and opposition from both the pari-mutuel industry and widespread anti-gambling concerns in the state is approximately nil.

Nor does the tone of the room’s discussion appear to have been as inclusive as the OPR report appeared to present it.  According to FlushDraw’s source, “The talk in the room was, again, about alienating some, making it not all-inclusive, and keeping the tracks out.”

The OPR story also raised the possibility that the Pechangas or other hardline tribes may already have been in contact with Amaya over the possibility of building a different sort of coalition in California, one that would seek to block pari-mutuel involvement.  Though FlushDraw had not received a response from Amaya prior to publication, a third-party source indicated that such a contact had not occurred.  “Completely false,” FlushDraw was told.

It’s become increasingly clear in recent weeks that the California online-poker debate has reached a political stalemate of sorts, with interested parties now working the media and assessing public response in an attempt to find a path forward.

The path of least resistance, naturally, appears to be an all-inclusive approach that would allow the future market itself to determine its own winners and losers, perhaps with a revenue-sharing agreement in place that would provide a taste of the financial pie to all interested parties.  Such an amicable solution, however, still appears to be a long way off.


Leave a Comment


One Response

  1. Original Pechanga

    How can Pechanga be trusted, when they have cheated and violated their own people? Pechanga’s Macarro practices apartheid on the reservation ( where he dies not live) and HE is the leader of a poker coalition? Ridiculous. Learn more ay Oh, and could the delay have anything to do with the political aspirations of his wife, lobbyist Holly Cook Macarro, who is on Hillary Clinton’s short list to be named native affairs adviser?


filter by

Dan Katz

29th February 2020 // Uncategorised

Is the Coronavirus a Threat to the 2020 WSOP?

This has been one hell of a week. The coronavirus (COVID-19) is picking up steam globally. World financial markets have...

Dan Katz

26th February 2020 // Uncategorised

Side Bets Available at PokerStars Poker Tables

Poker is gambling. We like to say that it is a game of skill – and it is – but it is also gambling. And that’s...

Dan Katz

17th February 2020 // News, Online Poker Action, Poker Tournaments

World Series of Poker Expands Online Bracelet Schedule to 14 Events

On Thursday, the World Series of Poker released the schedule for this summer’s online bracelet events, to be hosted...

Dan Katz

8th February 2020 // Gossip, News, Online Poker Action

Phil Galfond Down €750,000 to VeniVidi1993 in Galfond Challenge

Look, I don’t typically make a habit of feeling bad when people of means lose money, but oh man, I am starting to get...

Dan Katz

2nd February 2020 // News, Online Poker Action

PokerStars, partypoker Launching Dueling Bounty Tourney Series on Super Bowl Sunday

The year 2020 is already one-twelfth gone. It seems like just yesterday that Larry David was arguing that it was too...

Haley Hintze

31st January 2020 // Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Coronavirus Outbreak Forces Postponement of Triton Jeju Series

The Triton Super High Roller Series scheduled for mid-Februry in Jeju, South Korea has become the first poker event...