What Can Be Done to Foil Third-Party Online Poker Software?

The biggest trend – if you can call it that – in the online poker industry the last few years has been the move by the poker rooms away from catering to pros and hardcore grinders and toward recreational players. Poker rooms continue to implement policies to try to make life at the tables more enjoyable for casual players and for good reason. For one, poker is a game, it is supposed to be fun. And more importantly for the poker rooms, a lack of fun leads to player defections, which leads to less revenue. Recently, PokerStars banned seating scripts to try to solve the problem and reports are that partypoker will soon be banning heads-up displays (HUDs). These options should work fairly well, but what about methods to help recreational players without having to rely as much on the poker rooms’ ability to monitor for illegal software? Let’s take a look at a couple things poker rooms could, and in some cases are, doing.

Both seating scripts and HUDs work because the user employs hand/player tracking software. This software uses data collected by the user on their opponents to give the user an advantage. In the case of seating scripts, the software will search out the tables for players in its database that are marked by the user as weak and then sit the user down at their table automatically. With HUDs, data on each player, filtered by the software’s user, is displayed on the table, giving the player a handy cheat sheet of sorts on everybody (provided he has data on them).

retro robot toyThe data used by the software is usually collected with hand history text files save on the player’s computer by the poker room, but is sometimes scraped from the screen if text files aren’t available. The least scrupulous users might also buy hand histories or data from third-party sites to fill in their databases.

Anonymous Tables

We are all used to having our screen names identify us at the online poker tables, but what if they didn’t? Bovada and Ignition Poker use anonymous tables, labeling each player simply by a number, rather than a constant screen name. This number changes table to table.

And without screen names, you won’t know who you are playing against. Heck, if my brother and I logged in at the same time and both sat down at the same anonymous table, I would have no idea which player he was unless he specifically told me (or we were heads-up). And if we sat down at a second table together, our numbers would change.

Without screennames, there would be no way for poker tracking software to populate a database of opponents’ hands and therefore seating scripts would be useless. HUDs would still possibly have some use, as they could generate statistics for the current session and the current table, but that’s it. The sample size would be small, so a HUD wouldn’t necessarily be that accurate and once the software user leaves the table, all that info serves no purpose.

Blind Lobbies

Traditionally, players have been able to sift through the lobby and check out each table before deciding where to sit down. They can often see who is at the table as well as statistics about how that table has been playing, things like average pot size and average number of players seeing the flop. It is the way things have always been and makes total sense. See the tables and pick one.

But with this tried and true lobby structure, seating scripts are able to see all of the same table information that we players can with our own eyes. A seating script can scan every table and find the weakest players in a user’s database, then automatically sit the user down at the target’s table.

A blind lobby only allows poker players to choose basic table details like game type, stakes, and maximum number of seats. Once a player picks the type of table he wants to sit at, the software takes him to an open seat. The player does not actually hand-pick specific seats. It is like a live poker room, where a poker player signs up for a game and is then seated by the host. With a blind lobby, seating scripts are pointless, as the poker software does the seating, not the user’s script.

Blind lobbies would not completely get rid of the practice of bumhunting, which is when a player sits down at multiple tables – usually heads-up tables – and waits for a weaker player to sit down. If a known strong player sits, or possibly a player of unknown skill, the bumhunter simply sits out until the opponent leaves. A blind lobby would need to also implement penalties for table-hopping or repeated sitting out.

COMMENTS

Leave a Comment

*

LATEST NEWS

filter by

Dan Katz

8th February 2020 // Gossip, News, Online Poker Action

Phil Galfond Down €750,000 to VeniVidi1993 in Galfond Challenge

Look, I don’t typically make a habit of feeling bad when people of means lose money, but oh man, I am starting to get...

Dan Katz

2nd February 2020 // News, Online Poker Action

PokerStars, partypoker Launching Dueling Bounty Tourney Series on Super Bowl Sunday

The year 2020 is already one-twelfth gone. It seems like just yesterday that Larry David was arguing that it was too...

Haley Hintze

31st January 2020 // Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Coronavirus Outbreak Forces Postponement of Triton Jeju Series

The Triton Super High Roller Series scheduled for mid-Februry in Jeju, South Korea has become the first poker event...

Dan Katz

31st January 2020 // News, Poker Tournaments

High Roller Series Schedule Released for 2020 WSOP

The Super Bowl (oh wait, I don’t want to get sued… the “BIG GAME”) is this weekend, but once the offseason...

Haley Hintze

31st January 2020 // Industry, Misc, News, Poker Tournaments

Still a Waiting Game for Michigan Online Poker

Would-be Michigan online poker players are dealing with mixed emotions in the wake of news that fully legalized and...

Dan Katz

26th January 2020 // Industry, Misc, News, Op-ed

PokerStars Founder Isai Scheinberg Finally Surrenders to U.S. Authorities

Couldn’t avoid the inevitable If there was an online poker Mount Rushmore, Isai Scheinberg’s face would almost...